The question of whether Research and Development (R&D) should be awarded Michelin stars is one that has been debated for some time now. Michelin stars are highly coveted awards given to restaurants that excel in both quality and innovation in the culinary arts. R&D, while not a restaurant, is also a field of innovation and can be viewed as an important part of the culinary world.
In recent years, there have been growing calls for R&D to be eligible for Michelin stars, with some arguing that the award should be extended to those who have made significant contributions to the culinary arts through their research and development efforts. Supporters argue that awarding Michelin stars to R&D would recognize the important role it plays in advancing the culinary industry and its potential for future growth.
On the other hand, opponents of awarding Michelin stars to R&D argue that it would devalue the award by diluting its prestige. They point out that awarding such an award to a non-restaurant would make it less meaningful for restaurants and could lead to confusion about who exactly is eligible for such an accolade. In addition, some argue that awarding such an award could create a situation where non-restaurants are competing with restaurants on unfair terms, as they may not have had experience in running a restaurant or creating dishes.
Ultimately, whether or not R&D should be eligible for Michelin stars is something that will continue to be debated until a consensus is reached. For now, it seems unlikely that any changes will be made any time soon as there are still many valid arguments on both sides of this contentious issue.
At present, it appears unlikely that Research and Development (R&D) will receive Michelin Stars due to disagreements between proponents and opponents over whether awarding them devalues the award or creates unfair competition between restaurants and non-restaurants. Until there is consensus on this matter, it seems unlikely that any changes will be made regarding this issue anytime soon.